Brian is Sr.Director of Cloud Solutions at EMC, as well as founder of Cloudcast Media. He is a VMware vExpert, holds CCIE #3077, and an MBA from Wake Forest. Brian's industry viewpoints and writings can also be found on twitter (@bgracely), on his blog "Clouds of Change" (http://cloudsofchange.com) and he co-hosts the award-winning weekly podcast "The Cloudcast (.NET)" (http://thecloudcast.net) with Aaron Delp (@aarondelp). Brian is a DZone MVB and is not an employee of DZone and has posted 212 posts at DZone. You can read more from them at their website. View Full User Profile
...but several years into this latest phase of computing, it seems we
can't go more than a few weeks without someone trying to create a new
definition for Cloud Computing (here, here and here).
Everybody spinning a new cloud definition to help establish themselves
as the leader in this transition, according to their own model.
Do I blame companies, consultants, standards-bodies and media for trying
to establish themselves as a thought leader as things change? No,
that's normal behavior. But what really concerns me is the potential
damage this does to overall innovation across the industry if people
spend more time worrying about definitions than they do creativity. We
discussed this on The Cloudcast with Christian Reilly a few weeks ago, in the context of how he helped his company adopt a new services-centric model within their business.
Christian made a subtle,
but insightful, comment that we didn't put very many definitions around
"the Internet" as it was evolving throughout the 1990s. This allowed
companies and developers to be creative in how they created technology
and evolved it for their businesses.
Am I overthinking this or are the definers getting in the way of the thinkers and doers?